Item 72 - Typescript letter signed to Jim

Identity area

Reference code

Beaton/D/1/9/72

Unique identifier

GB 275 Beaton/D/1/9/72

Title

Typescript letter signed to Jim

Date(s)

  • 5 October 1959 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

2p paper

Context area

Name of creator

(d 1987)

Biographical history

Secretary to Beaton

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Beaton asked him to take down these notes while he dressed. He has just spoken to Weissberger who said that in the USA Beaton could sue Wolfit for damages. The complaint would be reported in the press, which would be very damaging to Wolfit, and then they could drop the suit. According to Beaton, Sykes' confidence that Wolfit would not find another job is "wishful thinking" and he is determined to denounce Wolfit even if it costs him money - but not too much. Asks Eileen if she has posted the private letter yet - Beaton does not want to read the reply when it comes. Weissberger suggested replacing the word "blackmail" by "exert pressure". Seale might be able to get a list of Equity Rules from Ernest Clark who said they were "all terribly sorry" about what Wolfit was doing to the play. Quotes the concluding sentences of the London Times Review [A3/1/65] which Jim will include in his report.

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

Script of material

Language and script notes

Physical characteristics and technical requirements

Finding aids

Allied materials area

Existence and location of originals

Existence and location of copies

Related units of description

Related descriptions

Notes area

Alternative identifier(s)

Access points

Subject access points

Place access points

Name access points

Genre access points

Description control area

Description identifier

Institution identifier

Rules and/or conventions used

Status

Level of detail

Dates of creation revision deletion

Language(s)

Script(s)

Sources

Accession area

Related subjects

Related people and organizations

Related genres

Related places