Identity area
Reference code
Beaton/D/1/9/67
Unique identifier
Title
Date(s)
- 22 September 1959 (Creation)
Level of description
Item
Extent and medium
paper
Context area
Name of creator
Repository
Archival history
Immediate source of acquisition or transfer
Content and structure area
Scope and content
Typescript letter signed with autograph postscript. Minster thinks it was for the best that the play did not go to London as they would have received "respectful criticism at best". Wolfit's behaviour was irritating and cost them money, and his acting was variable, but the play was unlikely to succeed even with a different actor. There is a limit to how many times a play can be rewritten. They should stop the production at Wolverhampton, and Beaton should write another play as soon as he feels up to it. Beaton has "an undoubted sense of the theatre" and this was a "near miss". It is his first duty as a manager to try to save his backers' money. Is sorry things turned out this way. Postscript: The performance at Brighton went well. They could have had the Westminster Theatre for four weeks but another management got it first. Has just had a talk with Freedman and given him the picture. Ernest Clark and Ann Firbank have other jobs.