Item 67 - Letter to Beaton

Identity area

Reference code

Beaton/D/1/9/67

Unique identifier

GB 275 Beaton/D/1/9/67

Title

Letter to Beaton

Date(s)

  • 22 September 1959 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

paper

Context area

Name of creator

(1901-1966)

Biographical history

Theatre director

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Typescript letter signed with autograph postscript. Minster thinks it was for the best that the play did not go to London as they would have received "respectful criticism at best". Wolfit's behaviour was irritating and cost them money, and his acting was variable, but the play was unlikely to succeed even with a different actor. There is a limit to how many times a play can be rewritten. They should stop the production at Wolverhampton, and Beaton should write another play as soon as he feels up to it. Beaton has "an undoubted sense of the theatre" and this was a "near miss". It is his first duty as a manager to try to save his backers' money. Is sorry things turned out this way. Postscript: The performance at Brighton went well. They could have had the Westminster Theatre for four weeks but another management got it first. Has just had a talk with Freedman and given him the picture. Ernest Clark and Ann Firbank have other jobs.

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

Script of material

Language and script notes

Physical characteristics and technical requirements

Finding aids

Allied materials area

Existence and location of originals

Existence and location of copies

Related units of description

Related descriptions

Notes area

Alternative identifier(s)

Access points

Subject access points

Place access points

Name access points

Genre access points

Description control area

Description identifier

Institution identifier

Rules and/or conventions used

Status

Level of detail

Dates of creation revision deletion

Language(s)

Script(s)

Sources

Accession area

Related subjects

Related people and organizations

Related genres

Related places